I actually believe it was a faked assassination for the reasons you put forth, many of the observations made in the film and a few things not mentioned. I'll certainly write more on this topic at some point. Love that you're putting it out there!
Miles Mathis has written about JFK faking his death...it's a long paper that makes a lot of sense. If true, imagine all the other events in history being faked.
Every few years some new distraction and dust is flung around to keep people guessing and never go never the truth. JFK faked his death...for what???? The RFK faked his own death. Then Jnr faked own death. Ted decided never to run for president. Good work. Anything New?
Ginsberg too is Con-Trolled Opposition. Such massive coverup and periodic distractions can only come from State.
In my country Pakistan, sitting President and Army Chief Ziaul-Haq was murdered. It was State.. Prime Minister Bhutto was judicially murdered..It was state. PM Liaqat Ali Khan was murdered. It was state. African presidents were murdered who refused covid WhackSination were murdered. It was state. LA countries heads of state are regularly killed. Always by the state.
For what? To create the illusion He was working for "the People." To let Him make moves against the Fed but get "assassinated." "Hero." Trump is likely slated for the same deal. They need "heroes" to keep stringing Us along.
Bed of car had a hatch and passage to hidden panic room. Wow. it could have been done a million ways but childish amateurish story can only come from these people. Every question by skeptics is answered by a new hack theory. Public runs after it.
The reality lies in Follow The Money rule. Johnson ....the unelected & chosen VP or POTUS Waiting in the Wings signs the Vietnam war bill; which Kennedy had decided to wind down the war and number of US troops involved; Johnson sends more troops and hikes up the costs of war. This happens within minutes of swearing in ceremony, even before Kennedy is buried. The cabal was afraid that Kennedy might have loyalists who could implicate and eliminate Johnson since RFK was still in place of substantial power.
Anyway public is always fooled and shafted.
Undoubtedly, Trump is a shill. A created distraction for major stuff to take place behind curtains in the law making halls. He will accomplish what none else could ever achieve. Greater than Gorbachev who brought down USSR.
The moneyed psychopaths in control have a script. And They have actors on the LITERAL world STAGE playing the parts to cast sandy hooks into Our emotions and drag Us where They want Us. And sometimes They don't even bother to get close when different actors are playing the same role:
Also... A while ago I did an analysis of the teeth of JFK and Jimmy Carter. I discovered that they were the same. No two People have the same teeth... And a look at the facial structure led Me to give high probability that where They differed, a wee bit of plastic surgery could have made the difference.
Good look! Personally, I give pretty decent probability that JFK played Jimmy Carter on the psychopaths' stage. I spent a fair amount of time a while back looking at the teeth of each of Them. To My perception, the teeth were identical. No two People have identical teeth, ergo...
And when You take the facial structure, You find that the similarities are many, and where they differ, surgery could account for it.
If One takes the shakespearean lines, "All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances; And one man in his time plays many parts..." and considers that it was seemingly written by John Dee or another on that level of aristocracy, who see Us as cattle, not "men and women," We might make a case for the whole of what We see on the LITERAL world STAGE being Them acting parts...
Great overview Michael. JFK was killed but the Zapruder film was heavily edited. One thing they did was black out the wound at the back of his head and add a fake blood splatter at the front of his head, to match the official story. There are several videos and books about this forgery.
A week after the Christchurch NZ mosque shootings, I went down and looked very carefully at the concrete gutter, In the street, where a young woman’s head rested while being shot -twice- with an M16, from about 6’ …closely spaced shots: “Pop-pop”.
No missile exited her head. Nothing scratched the surface it lay upon. Nothing.
I think it should have been a warning sign at the time when Ardern ordered that the name of the shooter can't even be mentioned in the media.
It was not just a sign that something with the Christchurch shooting wasn't quite right but also, and more importantly, what type of 'leader' Ardern is. A few years later and it became very obvious indeed.
That is all true. For many reasons. But I am seeking reference. We have just been delivered another gigantic conundrum concerning authenticity of a murder in Dallas, 60yrs or so ago; probably fantasy, but considerable effort has gone into it.
While on the ground, recently, another fantastic ‘origin’ story lies open on the street of a far away land also with no forensics - no real forensics now - to back it up. It is a story. There is a story-line.
How do we establish truth? Of the hundreds of other onlookers that day not one even glanced at that spot, nor took a walk along the footpath line where 27shots were fired, in the video. At nothing.
So those correlated moments and realities and questions are lost. They sink into atoms.
How do we establish truth, when it is in front of you ? But no one else is looking?
If you haven't watched Dr Steven Greer's inspirational, transformational documentary entitled The Lost Century please do it now. It's an informative, exploration of the financial, scientific and political corruption that has kept humanity bound to a course of self-destruction. A sense of urgency builds throughout the presentation which is resolved in the hopeful conclusion that portrays the beautiful recovery of our planet and the unlimited possibilities of liberty and happiness that await us if we act now.
It makes the most sense in the most unemotional and logical way to kill JFK. To leave him alive is not practical in any world.
I grew up in a bloodline family and they sacrifice their own all the time. Some are born to be sacrificed.
They are playing a long game against God Almighty and individuals are nothing if not expendable in the game. Including a second son who is fairly useless except as a pawn to further the game.
JFK was not a hero and his father and many others knew it. Taking him out was no problem. Allowing JFK to live would have been a problem. Game over.
I don't trust Weidner. He's made a nice living off misdirection and conjecture.
Well...let's see. I've been a big fan of Kubrick if for no other reason than I think he's a master of the subtle reveal. He tells a lot of truth about the world with fictional narrative. The eyes to see approach to revealing what he knew. I think this is why he changed so much of Steven King's book, THE SHINING, because he used the book to hang his truths on. He was very crafty this way and said so. He hired famous actors and used books as jumping off points for what he was revealing and to secure financing for his films. You have to look carefully at what he's saying and it's interesting. Also, he was a great film stylist with great taste. I'm not at all sure about what he was like as an individual.
And that's where Mr. Weidner comes in. Jay claimed up close and personal contact with Kubrick which enabled him to know many things about the space walk fakery, etc.
There is no evidence Jay Weidner was close to Kubrick. I don't think Kubrick ever told anyone outright what had happened. He made it clear to his family and friends that they didn't need to know for their own well-being. I doubt he would have divulged to Jay Weidner who I could never confirm ever actually knew Kubrick that personally.
So...Jay wrote a book about his supposed experiences with Kubrick and made documentaries that I doubt the truthfulness of and made money doing so. This is an example of what I'm talking about. Was he purposefully misdirecting or adding conjecture to what he claimed as truths? IDK, but I do think portraying Jay Weidner as an expert when there are serious doubts he is an expert on his subject of choice is a fine way to discredit theories and distort truths so anyone who uses Jay Weidner as a source becomes suspect as well.
There are more things, but this was many years ago when I looked into Jay Weidner and not finding him credible, I've not kept much of what he's said or done fresh in my memory.
"They wanted WAR"
I agree with you but ultimately what is the MOTIVE for WAR?
It's money at the surface level but for the ultimate string pullers, they moved beyond money many generations ago.
This kinda comes with the territory of having net worth in the TENS OF TRILLIONS (as a conservative estimate).
The ULTIMATE motive is CONTROL/DOMINANCE (a.k.a "full spectrum dominance")....ALWAYS!
I actually believe it was a faked assassination for the reasons you put forth, many of the observations made in the film and a few things not mentioned. I'll certainly write more on this topic at some point. Love that you're putting it out there!
Miles Mathis has written about JFK faking his death...it's a long paper that makes a lot of sense. If true, imagine all the other events in history being faked.
Do you have a link to his paper by any chance?
Would love to add it to this piece.
Found it in micro second via Dr Google
https://www.scribd.com/document/335638945/Miles-W-Mathis-barindex2
One has to move few fingers only. No laziness here.
Nicely impartial, thanks Michael.
Nice article, thanks.
https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound...
Really CIA? Abbottabad compound (smh). What a bunch of trolls.
I know! Right?
I recently had a very, very interesting conversation with someone about that.
*ASIO starts breathing heavily*
Every few years some new distraction and dust is flung around to keep people guessing and never go never the truth. JFK faked his death...for what???? The RFK faked his own death. Then Jnr faked own death. Ted decided never to run for president. Good work. Anything New?
Ginsberg too is Con-Trolled Opposition. Such massive coverup and periodic distractions can only come from State.
In my country Pakistan, sitting President and Army Chief Ziaul-Haq was murdered. It was State.. Prime Minister Bhutto was judicially murdered..It was state. PM Liaqat Ali Khan was murdered. It was state. African presidents were murdered who refused covid WhackSination were murdered. It was state. LA countries heads of state are regularly killed. Always by the state.
Usually it is with International cooperation.
For what? To create the illusion He was working for "the People." To let Him make moves against the Fed but get "assassinated." "Hero." Trump is likely slated for the same deal. They need "heroes" to keep stringing Us along.
Escape the Cave! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/escape-the-cave
Response to a Meme (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/response-to-a-meme
Bed of car had a hatch and passage to hidden panic room. Wow. it could have been done a million ways but childish amateurish story can only come from these people. Every question by skeptics is answered by a new hack theory. Public runs after it.
The reality lies in Follow The Money rule. Johnson ....the unelected & chosen VP or POTUS Waiting in the Wings signs the Vietnam war bill; which Kennedy had decided to wind down the war and number of US troops involved; Johnson sends more troops and hikes up the costs of war. This happens within minutes of swearing in ceremony, even before Kennedy is buried. The cabal was afraid that Kennedy might have loyalists who could implicate and eliminate Johnson since RFK was still in place of substantial power.
Anyway public is always fooled and shafted.
Undoubtedly, Trump is a shill. A created distraction for major stuff to take place behind curtains in the law making halls. He will accomplish what none else could ever achieve. Greater than Gorbachev who brought down USSR.
The moneyed psychopaths in control have a script. And They have actors on the LITERAL world STAGE playing the parts to cast sandy hooks into Our emotions and drag Us where They want Us. And sometimes They don't even bother to get close when different actors are playing the same role:
Can You Gaetz Which One is Which? (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/can-you-gaetz-which-one-is-which
Nice play on words..Gaetz
Thanks! 🙏🏻 💜 🙏🏻
Also... A while ago I did an analysis of the teeth of JFK and Jimmy Carter. I discovered that they were the same. No two People have the same teeth... And a look at the facial structure led Me to give high probability that where They differed, a wee bit of plastic surgery could have made the difference.
Yes, Trump is a character on the stage...
Good look! Personally, I give pretty decent probability that JFK played Jimmy Carter on the psychopaths' stage. I spent a fair amount of time a while back looking at the teeth of each of Them. To My perception, the teeth were identical. No two People have identical teeth, ergo...
And when You take the facial structure, You find that the similarities are many, and where they differ, surgery could account for it.
So yeah... Pretty high probability.
Haven’t heard that one before. Pretty wild if true!
If One takes the shakespearean lines, "All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances; And one man in his time plays many parts..." and considers that it was seemingly written by John Dee or another on that level of aristocracy, who see Us as cattle, not "men and women," We might make a case for the whole of what We see on the LITERAL world STAGE being Them acting parts...
Like Plato's Cave...
Escape the Cave! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/escape-the-cave
Great overview Michael. JFK was killed but the Zapruder film was heavily edited. One thing they did was black out the wound at the back of his head and add a fake blood splatter at the front of his head, to match the official story. There are several videos and books about this forgery.
One thing is for sure - Oswald didn't shoot him!
https://substack.com/@stevenberger/note/c-78364951?r=1nm0v2
Oh that's an absolute certainty to the same extent that Al Qaeda had NOTHING to do with 9/11.
Oswald did NOT kill JFK and didn't even shoot at him. 100% Patsy.
A week after the Christchurch NZ mosque shootings, I went down and looked very carefully at the concrete gutter, In the street, where a young woman’s head rested while being shot -twice- with an M16, from about 6’ …closely spaced shots: “Pop-pop”.
No missile exited her head. Nothing scratched the surface it lay upon. Nothing.
The question is,
What are the chances ?
I think it should have been a warning sign at the time when Ardern ordered that the name of the shooter can't even be mentioned in the media.
It was not just a sign that something with the Christchurch shooting wasn't quite right but also, and more importantly, what type of 'leader' Ardern is. A few years later and it became very obvious indeed.
That is all true. For many reasons. But I am seeking reference. We have just been delivered another gigantic conundrum concerning authenticity of a murder in Dallas, 60yrs or so ago; probably fantasy, but considerable effort has gone into it.
While on the ground, recently, another fantastic ‘origin’ story lies open on the street of a far away land also with no forensics - no real forensics now - to back it up. It is a story. There is a story-line.
How do we establish truth? Of the hundreds of other onlookers that day not one even glanced at that spot, nor took a walk along the footpath line where 27shots were fired, in the video. At nothing.
So those correlated moments and realities and questions are lost. They sink into atoms.
How do we establish truth, when it is in front of you ? But no one else is looking?
You are asking THE question. Wish I could say I have a good answer but I am very much still looking for one myself...
Thank you Michael.
Appreciate the answer.
I guess we’ll never know unless we keep trying.
If you haven't watched Dr Steven Greer's inspirational, transformational documentary entitled The Lost Century please do it now. It's an informative, exploration of the financial, scientific and political corruption that has kept humanity bound to a course of self-destruction. A sense of urgency builds throughout the presentation which is resolved in the hopeful conclusion that portrays the beautiful recovery of our planet and the unlimited possibilities of liberty and happiness that await us if we act now.
Please help spread this link far and wide across the internet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLF3PWieN_8
It makes the most sense in the most unemotional and logical way to kill JFK. To leave him alive is not practical in any world.
I grew up in a bloodline family and they sacrifice their own all the time. Some are born to be sacrificed.
They are playing a long game against God Almighty and individuals are nothing if not expendable in the game. Including a second son who is fairly useless except as a pawn to further the game.
JFK was not a hero and his father and many others knew it. Taking him out was no problem. Allowing JFK to live would have been a problem. Game over.
I don't trust Weidner. He's made a nice living off misdirection and conjecture.
Thanks for your article. Interesting, though.
"I don't trust Weidner. He's made a nice living off misdirection and conjecture."
Do you have examples of other "misdirection and conjecture" by Weidner? I think it could give very important context/framing for this piece.
Many thanks in advance.
Well...let's see. I've been a big fan of Kubrick if for no other reason than I think he's a master of the subtle reveal. He tells a lot of truth about the world with fictional narrative. The eyes to see approach to revealing what he knew. I think this is why he changed so much of Steven King's book, THE SHINING, because he used the book to hang his truths on. He was very crafty this way and said so. He hired famous actors and used books as jumping off points for what he was revealing and to secure financing for his films. You have to look carefully at what he's saying and it's interesting. Also, he was a great film stylist with great taste. I'm not at all sure about what he was like as an individual.
And that's where Mr. Weidner comes in. Jay claimed up close and personal contact with Kubrick which enabled him to know many things about the space walk fakery, etc.
There is no evidence Jay Weidner was close to Kubrick. I don't think Kubrick ever told anyone outright what had happened. He made it clear to his family and friends that they didn't need to know for their own well-being. I doubt he would have divulged to Jay Weidner who I could never confirm ever actually knew Kubrick that personally.
So...Jay wrote a book about his supposed experiences with Kubrick and made documentaries that I doubt the truthfulness of and made money doing so. This is an example of what I'm talking about. Was he purposefully misdirecting or adding conjecture to what he claimed as truths? IDK, but I do think portraying Jay Weidner as an expert when there are serious doubts he is an expert on his subject of choice is a fine way to discredit theories and distort truths so anyone who uses Jay Weidner as a source becomes suspect as well.
There are more things, but this was many years ago when I looked into Jay Weidner and not finding him credible, I've not kept much of what he's said or done fresh in my memory.
Thanks for that. Very valid point. Need to look up that book. What was it called?