The World Health Assembly is the decision-making body of WHO. It is attended by delegations from all WHO Member States and focuses on a specific health agenda prepared by the Executive Board. The main functions of the World Health Assembly are to determine the policies of the Organization, appoint the Director-General, supervise financial policies, and review and approve the proposed programme budget.
In simple terms, the World Health Assembly (WHA) is the ‘Parliament’ of the World Health Organisation akin to the UN’s General Assembly.
Given the IHR is not a new legal instrument and has existed since 2005, any amendments only need to be approved by a simple majority vote at the World Health Assembly (WHO’s Parliament) and are not required to be voted on by the parliaments or governments of the member states or signed off by their leaders!
The amendements to the IHR are very concerning to put it mildly and amongst other things, will effectively end any national sovereignty the member nations have when it comes to managing their health affairs, as well as anything that the WHO (in its sole discretion) deems to be related to health and managing pandemics.
who has been living and breathing this 24/7 and has dedicated the last two years of his life to the massive task of stopping the WHO’s power grab.
The proposed amendements to IHR are as follows:
Remove the existing IHR language granting “full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.” They are actively attempting to eliminate “dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms” from the International Health Regulations.
Change IHR recommendations from “non-binding” to legally binding such that all member countries would be required to obey and implement them.
Create requirements for a global digital health certification network that could be used to restrict access and travel.
Coerce extreme lockdown measures, including the creation of “quarantine of suspect travelers, preferably in facilities away from the point of entry,” aka “quarantine camps” seen during the COVID-19 pandemic in China and elsewhere.
Allow the WHO Director-General to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) at will, even if there was merely the “potential” for an emergency.
Require nations to use certain medications while prohibiting the use of others during emergencies.
Allow the WHO to commandeer medical supplies in any country, transfer them to other countries, and evade laws on intellectual property.
This is what is being voted on right now in Geneva!!
WHO is attending from your country?
(see what I did there)
All 194 member nations of the WHO are represented in the 76th seating of the World Health Assembly currently underway in Geneva.
Some of the representatives are elected politicians while many others are unelected and faceless bureaucrats.
and his network of global helpers around the world, we now know the names and public contact details of the representatives of many of the countries attending the 76th WHA…and potentially selling out their own citizens by voting in favour of these amendments.
We have a name for such acts. It’s called high treason and in many countries it still carries the death penalty!
Contact your country representatives currently in Geneva using the list above and demand they refuse to approve the IHR amendments as they currently stand.
You can use the bulletpoints in the summary by James above to explain to them in simple terms why these proposed amendements are highly dangerous, especially given they will not require any further ratification at a national level by either the Parliament or the government.
This initiative has the support of several members of the Australian Parliament, including Senator Malcolm Roberts who has become the leading voice in Parliament calling for #AusExitWHO.
I sat down with Senator Roberts for an in-depth interview about this initiative a few months ago and you can find it below:
Actionable Truth Media is 100% Independent and does not receive any support from governments, companies or political parties . To receive new posts and support our work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The enemy at the gate...and the traitors in our midst
The enemy at the gate...and the traitors in our midst
The enemy at the gate...and the traitors in our midst
Right now, the Seventy-sixth World Health Assembly is being held in Geneva, Switzerland. It is scheduled to end on Tuesday, May 30th.
As per the WHO’s own website:
In simple terms, the World Health Assembly (WHA) is the ‘Parliament’ of the World Health Organisation akin to the UN’s General Assembly.
One of the items on the official agenda is the very inconspicuous sounding “Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005)”.
However, as you probably understand by now, the absolute worst things are usually the ones hiding in plain sight! This is no different.
The WHA will discuss and seek to ratify a series of amendements to the International Health Regulations (IHR) which were originally passed in 2005. The IHR is essentially a list of rules that the WHO advises all member states to follow.
Given the IHR is not a new legal instrument and has existed since 2005, any amendments only need to be approved by a simple majority vote at the World Health Assembly (WHO’s Parliament) and are not required to be voted on by the parliaments or governments of the member states or signed off by their leaders!
This is in contrast to the “Pandemic prevention, preparedness and response accord” (a.k.a the Pandemic Treaty) which is a new instrument and will require ratification by individual member states.
The amendements to the IHR are very concerning to put it mildly and amongst other things, will effectively end any national sovereignty the member nations have when it comes to managing their health affairs, as well as anything that the WHO (in its sole discretion) deems to be related to health and managing pandemics.
The amendements are written in complicated legal jargon but have been summarised in plain language by
The proposed amendements to IHR are as follows:
Remove the existing IHR language granting “full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.” They are actively attempting to eliminate “dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms” from the International Health Regulations.
Change IHR recommendations from “non-binding” to legally binding such that all member countries would be required to obey and implement them.
Create requirements for a global digital health certification network that could be used to restrict access and travel.
Coerce extreme lockdown measures, including the creation of “quarantine of suspect travelers, preferably in facilities away from the point of entry,” aka “quarantine camps” seen during the COVID-19 pandemic in China and elsewhere.
Allow the WHO Director-General to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) at will, even if there was merely the “potential” for an emergency.
Require nations to use certain medications while prohibiting the use of others during emergencies.
Allow the WHO to commandeer medical supplies in any country, transfer them to other countries, and evade laws on intellectual property.
This is what is being voted on right now in Geneva!!
WHO is attending from your country?
(see what I did there)
All 194 member nations of the WHO are represented in the 76th seating of the World Health Assembly currently underway in Geneva.
Some of the representatives are elected politicians while many others are unelected and faceless bureaucrats.
Faceless no more!
Thanks again to the tireless efforts by
We have a name for such acts. It’s called high treason and in many countries it still carries the death penalty!
Here is the full list:
YOUR CALL TO ACTION
Contact your country representatives currently in Geneva using the list above and demand they refuse to approve the IHR amendments as they currently stand.
You can use the bulletpoints in the summary by James above to explain to them in simple terms why these proposed amendements are highly dangerous, especially given they will not require any further ratification at a national level by either the Parliament or the government.
The Australian Perspective
In Australia there is an excellent initiative calling for Australia to leave the WHO altogether.
This initiative has the support of several members of the Australian Parliament, including Senator Malcolm Roberts who has become the leading voice in Parliament calling for #AusExitWHO.
I sat down with Senator Roberts for an in-depth interview about this initiative a few months ago and you can find it below:
Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts on #AusExitWHO
Discussing an Australian Exit from the WHO and a few other topics
Actionable Truth Media is 100% Independent and does not receive any support from governments, companies or political parties . To receive new posts and support our work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.