Nothing that is happening in Israel or Gaza can negate the treason being committing by the American forces bullying that part of the world.
Treason is defined in the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3, as consisting "only in levying War against (the United States), or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
All members of the American military take an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; (and to) bear true faith and allegiance to the same."
When the military is committed to foreign actions without a declaration of war by Congress, as required by Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 11 of the Constitution, that is a violation of the Constitution, arguably the action of domestic enemies.
When a member of the military participates in an unconstitutional foreign military deployment, s/he violates both the Constitution and his/her oath to "support and defend" it, giving "aid and comfort" to it's "domestic enemies," committing treason by the definition given by the Constitution.
You're obviously much more across the US constitution than I am as I am not American.
My favourite bit is "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". After all, isn't this the ultimate purpose of any decent human ever born?
Have you seen this doco? If not, I could not recommend it enough as it has NEVER been more pertinent in the entire known history of our species as RIGHT NOW at this very moment:
It doesn't take being an American to know more than most of them about their own government. You probably don't know that the phrase started out as "life, liberty, and the pursuit of property," but after some discussion got changed. Given the Marxism that has crept into our government, they might have assumed that happiness was gong to come easier than property, if they were anti-federalists.
I don't think they will still use Nukes for it if it ever does get built. Technology has moved a lot in the 60 years since the Lawrence Livermore Plan.
Radioactivity hasn't changed a bit besides our being more poorly educated about it in a world where the light from LEDs is thought to be more dangerous than that from the sun.
Project Rulison was a project in the late 60s that tried the use of nuclear detonation to do what hydraulics are use for today in fracking. It worked fine, but all the released natural gas was too radioactive to be used as usual.
Have watched the video, which is good. I'd point out that in the agreement that all the Levant including Cyprus, Greece & Egypt (also Italy) tried to come to in 2019 over this gas asset, the Palestine Authority was there. Hamas was not.
And Hezbollah seems to be threatening the States, its ships in particular, more than it is Israel. The States Navy seems to have taken notice as well, their closest ship was parked up in the Aegean by something that I saw on X/Twitter recently.
Hamas has over 150K relatively advanced medium range rockets supplied by Iran. These can reach pretty much anywhere in Israel. They also have what is effectively a well structured and well equipped ground force which can definitely give the IDF a run for its money like it did back in 2006. They are much more dangerous for Israel by orders of magnitude compared to Hamas . Hizbullah means "party of god (Allah)" in Arabic btw. They are technically a Lebanese political party but none of the institutions of the Lebanese state (especially its military) are any match to it.
Strange situation basically having a large private army in your country that you have little control over. But West is in danger of heading that way as well.
Hard to figure out what's going on with this war even knowing of the canal and the gas and the ports.
"having a large private army in your country that you have little control over" is a fairly accurate assessment except the word "private". Hizbullah is anything but "private. They are effectively a division of the IRGC (Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps) comprised of Lebanese Shīʿates instead of Iranian soldiers. Their funding comes almost exclusively from the Islamic Republic.
Lebanon in itself is a failed state whose institutions cannot enforce anything on anyone and are largely non-existent altogether (e.g the regular Lebanese Army has no Air Force and effectively no navy either).
This guy has been exposing NWO for many years ! All his lectures are very very long ! His videos get banned quickly . So I suggest you just watch as long as you like - he brings up interesting points
He has a whole series of videos on Erev rav I found interesting
Ben Gurion Canal I heard wuz given up in the 1960's--it WUZ true but deemed impossible an' not $-saavy. Nukes? Radiation? No go for the Arabs. Entire story is a HUGE Red herring (with sour cream anyone?). Everyone's goin' OF COURSE it makes sense. This is the OFFICIAL unofficial story--ya cain't find anythin' else once ya look. That should be a clue...globalist laffin' at all who are eatin' it up like popcorn.
I'm not sayin' the Cabal isn't interested in trade routes an' real estate--but this ain't it. This is a bubbe meise an' too many are fallin' fer it...nevah gonna happen . (15 minute city? YES! competin' with BRICS? yessiree! the rest... bunk-o-rama an' sad ya spent so much time on what seemed ta be an aha moment--heck, I wuz there too!)
The paid makeup consultant was FED this non-kosher baloney--influencers bought cheep cheep cheep--clearly NOT her wheelhouse. Oh, while applyin' eye liner I came upon this brilliant theory an' researched it betw. mani pedis--rilly? She's not half bad as a talkin' head but... all baloney.
The plan to use 500+ nukes? C'mon...
The entire MSM & Alt-Media went fer THIS great story (hogwarsh), THIS discovery--lbut it's ook here not there.... nope, it's laser pointer-itis. No BG Canal is in the plannin'.... not now, never gonna be
I agree with you that no one is going to implement the original plan to build the canal using nukes. No arguments there.
However, as I hopefully demonstrated in my article, there is a HUGE commercial opportunity that can be unlocked by expanding significantly the capability to transport crude oil by land between Eilat (Red sea) and Ashkelon (Mediterranean Sea).
This opportunity is amplified many times over if there is a local viable alternative to the Suez Canal located in a country that is unlikely to ever walk away from unconditional alliance with the 'west' (unlike Egypt).
The amounts of money to be made by all parties involved in this are almost impossible to accurately quantify due to their size BUT they are predicated on removing any potential 'threat' from the Gaza strip first.
As far as building the Canal from a pure engineering perspective, it is challenging but absolutely possible using current technology provided the economics stack up (and they ABSOLUTELY do if the 'threat' is eliminated) and definitely do not require the use of nukes.
totally agree re levelin' Gaza for "commerical opportunities" but I still think this whole tale's a red herring b/c even without nukes the expense (over $100 billion vs far far less ta widen Suez) makes zero sense an' the fact that "this this this" is what they're all shoutin' in unison--left, right, center makes me think it's sumthin' else... I understand it's possible... so is buildin' a high speed railway 'cross the USA (ain't gonna happen). This narrative is bein' pushed harder than the clot shots so jus' sayin' I ain't buyin' it an' think it's misdirecton. Could they? Sure. Will they? Doubteful--but the chorus they will is deafenin'. Level Gaza, yup, nab the coast, yup---but all this is not just fer Israel (which may get leveled "herself") -- I fear it's ta serve Brits, US, etc. more an' Israel which blows apart what the plan is. Guess we'll have ta wait an' see but imo this isn't about Israel's singular "grab" (they just foller orders) so they alone would have an alt. to Suez. It's a bigger story an' we ain't in on it BUT I know there's tech / medi-cull tech stuff goin' on that needs no canals--plus "spy stuff" that'd make James Bond blush.
Everyone an' his brother came upon the BG Canal Tale an' grabbed on it like pitt bulls... --also, 'fore long BG's name will be mud too... I'm wondrin' if they'll take away Rothschild Boul. an' rename it...) Their "plan" is bigger--they are wipin' out not just Gaza but the map of Israel (I think...)
There is also this element that ties in directly to the $$$. I didn't cover it in the article itself but it's definitely something to be aware of! https://www.timesofisrael.com/amid-ongoing-war-bp-and-eni-among-firms-awarded-gas-exploration-licenses-in-israel/
Nothing that is happening in Israel or Gaza can negate the treason being committing by the American forces bullying that part of the world.
Treason is defined in the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3, as consisting "only in levying War against (the United States), or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
All members of the American military take an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; (and to) bear true faith and allegiance to the same."
When the military is committed to foreign actions without a declaration of war by Congress, as required by Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 11 of the Constitution, that is a violation of the Constitution, arguably the action of domestic enemies.
When a member of the military participates in an unconstitutional foreign military deployment, s/he violates both the Constitution and his/her oath to "support and defend" it, giving "aid and comfort" to it's "domestic enemies," committing treason by the definition given by the Constitution.
Could not have said it better myself!!
You're obviously much more across the US constitution than I am as I am not American.
My favourite bit is "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". After all, isn't this the ultimate purpose of any decent human ever born?
Have you seen this doco? If not, I could not recommend it enough as it has NEVER been more pertinent in the entire known history of our species as RIGHT NOW at this very moment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk-Aq-z8kB0
It doesn't take being an American to know more than most of them about their own government. You probably don't know that the phrase started out as "life, liberty, and the pursuit of property," but after some discussion got changed. Given the Marxism that has crept into our government, they might have assumed that happiness was gong to come easier than property, if they were anti-federalists.
Great find! I am unable to understand this level of psychopathic greed.
I hope it never gets built. Can you imagine the level of radioactive fallout detonating that many nukes for the excavation? Insane.
I don't think they will still use Nukes for it if it ever does get built. Technology has moved a lot in the 60 years since the Lawrence Livermore Plan.
Radioactivity hasn't changed a bit besides our being more poorly educated about it in a world where the light from LEDs is thought to be more dangerous than that from the sun.
Oh good. That is a relief.
Project Rulison was a project in the late 60s that tried the use of nuclear detonation to do what hydraulics are use for today in fracking. It worked fine, but all the released natural gas was too radioactive to be used as usual.
Have watched the video, which is good. I'd point out that in the agreement that all the Levant including Cyprus, Greece & Egypt (also Italy) tried to come to in 2019 over this gas asset, the Palestine Authority was there. Hamas was not.
And Hezbollah seems to be threatening the States, its ships in particular, more than it is Israel. The States Navy seems to have taken notice as well, their closest ship was parked up in the Aegean by something that I saw on X/Twitter recently.
Hamas has over 150K relatively advanced medium range rockets supplied by Iran. These can reach pretty much anywhere in Israel. They also have what is effectively a well structured and well equipped ground force which can definitely give the IDF a run for its money like it did back in 2006. They are much more dangerous for Israel by orders of magnitude compared to Hamas . Hizbullah means "party of god (Allah)" in Arabic btw. They are technically a Lebanese political party but none of the institutions of the Lebanese state (especially its military) are any match to it.
Strange situation basically having a large private army in your country that you have little control over. But West is in danger of heading that way as well.
Hard to figure out what's going on with this war even knowing of the canal and the gas and the ports.
"having a large private army in your country that you have little control over" is a fairly accurate assessment except the word "private". Hizbullah is anything but "private. They are effectively a division of the IRGC (Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps) comprised of Lebanese Shīʿates instead of Iranian soldiers. Their funding comes almost exclusively from the Islamic Republic.
Lebanon in itself is a failed state whose institutions cannot enforce anything on anyone and are largely non-existent altogether (e.g the regular Lebanese Army has no Air Force and effectively no navy either).
https://youtu.be/VxfZjpHtP6Q?si=qAA8DrLyZCH-TAYs
Just catching up and going through your back articles. So incredibly impressed with your analysis.
Thank you.
Rabbi Alon Anava
On Israel’s 9/11 must listen
https://youtu.be/VxfZjpHtP6Q?si=qAA8DrLyZCH-TAYs
Any chance for a short summary before I commit to watching for 3 hours? Many thanks đŸ™‚
This guy has been exposing NWO for many years ! All his lectures are very very long ! His videos get banned quickly . So I suggest you just watch as long as you like - he brings up interesting points
He has a whole series of videos on Erev rav I found interesting
https://atzmut.com/course/erev-rav/
Ok thanks. Is the basic premise of the message in this video is that these are the end times and the Messiah is coming?
Ben Gurion Canal I heard wuz given up in the 1960's--it WUZ true but deemed impossible an' not $-saavy. Nukes? Radiation? No go for the Arabs. Entire story is a HUGE Red herring (with sour cream anyone?). Everyone's goin' OF COURSE it makes sense. This is the OFFICIAL unofficial story--ya cain't find anythin' else once ya look. That should be a clue...globalist laffin' at all who are eatin' it up like popcorn.
I'm not sayin' the Cabal isn't interested in trade routes an' real estate--but this ain't it. This is a bubbe meise an' too many are fallin' fer it...nevah gonna happen . (15 minute city? YES! competin' with BRICS? yessiree! the rest... bunk-o-rama an' sad ya spent so much time on what seemed ta be an aha moment--heck, I wuz there too!)
The paid makeup consultant was FED this non-kosher baloney--influencers bought cheep cheep cheep--clearly NOT her wheelhouse. Oh, while applyin' eye liner I came upon this brilliant theory an' researched it betw. mani pedis--rilly? She's not half bad as a talkin' head but... all baloney.
The plan to use 500+ nukes? C'mon...
The entire MSM & Alt-Media went fer THIS great story (hogwarsh), THIS discovery--lbut it's ook here not there.... nope, it's laser pointer-itis. No BG Canal is in the plannin'.... not now, never gonna be
I agree with you that no one is going to implement the original plan to build the canal using nukes. No arguments there.
However, as I hopefully demonstrated in my article, there is a HUGE commercial opportunity that can be unlocked by expanding significantly the capability to transport crude oil by land between Eilat (Red sea) and Ashkelon (Mediterranean Sea).
This opportunity is amplified many times over if there is a local viable alternative to the Suez Canal located in a country that is unlikely to ever walk away from unconditional alliance with the 'west' (unlike Egypt).
The amounts of money to be made by all parties involved in this are almost impossible to accurately quantify due to their size BUT they are predicated on removing any potential 'threat' from the Gaza strip first.
As far as building the Canal from a pure engineering perspective, it is challenging but absolutely possible using current technology provided the economics stack up (and they ABSOLUTELY do if the 'threat' is eliminated) and definitely do not require the use of nukes.
totally agree re levelin' Gaza for "commerical opportunities" but I still think this whole tale's a red herring b/c even without nukes the expense (over $100 billion vs far far less ta widen Suez) makes zero sense an' the fact that "this this this" is what they're all shoutin' in unison--left, right, center makes me think it's sumthin' else... I understand it's possible... so is buildin' a high speed railway 'cross the USA (ain't gonna happen). This narrative is bein' pushed harder than the clot shots so jus' sayin' I ain't buyin' it an' think it's misdirecton. Could they? Sure. Will they? Doubteful--but the chorus they will is deafenin'. Level Gaza, yup, nab the coast, yup---but all this is not just fer Israel (which may get leveled "herself") -- I fear it's ta serve Brits, US, etc. more an' Israel which blows apart what the plan is. Guess we'll have ta wait an' see but imo this isn't about Israel's singular "grab" (they just foller orders) so they alone would have an alt. to Suez. It's a bigger story an' we ain't in on it BUT I know there's tech / medi-cull tech stuff goin' on that needs no canals--plus "spy stuff" that'd make James Bond blush.
Everyone an' his brother came upon the BG Canal Tale an' grabbed on it like pitt bulls... --also, 'fore long BG's name will be mud too... I'm wondrin' if they'll take away Rothschild Boul. an' rename it...) Their "plan" is bigger--they are wipin' out not just Gaza but the map of Israel (I think...)