1 Comment
⭠ Return to thread

I was originally a paid subscriber to Malone. However, he abruptly and nastily kicked me off his list of paid subscribers (the only ones who can comment on his writings) when I persisted in asking about social impact markets and more specifically if he would share whether or not he had any investments to that effect. He righteously said that the only earnings he had were from his own work (which we have since learned is arguably false) and said my questions about his position on social impact investing constituted an unacceptable personal attack which warranted his banishing me from his comment section. Even I was taken aback by his hostility and nastiness in response to my inquiry. In hindsight, I can clearly see the tactic he was using. Ironically, it was the same shaming and shunning tactic Dr. Nass used when I dared ask her how it could be that Dr. Malone supposedly was very familiar with the deep state, etc. but claimed to have had no awareness that our DOD was developing and advancing cyborg technology.

Over time, for me a pattern has emerged where I recognize that those who early on captured the medical freedom space with their sympathy and credentials (appearing to have come to their senses and thereby validating the citizens who recognized something was amiss) have actually effectively steered the freedom movement into cul de sacs or down lanes that are essential dead ends. Are we winning yet? Jabs still deployed. No accountability. Four years out, hearings given in empty conference rooms. Media still silent to the harms inflicted. I’d say in 4 years for all the “effort” expended and money collected by the thought leaders….very little has changed. And what wins have happened have done little to raise true awareness and have come so late in the game that they have little effect….like the settlement with the FDA relative to Ivermectin. Tre wheels of our imperfect justice system move way to slowly and TPTB can nullify the potential damaging impact of wins given the other levers of power they control. How many of your friends, neighbors and acquaintances are even aware of the lawsuit against the FDA?

The other pattern that has emerged is the “thought leaders” on one hand criticize the NGO’s and the influence of the foundations of the likes of Gates. But they in turn, have gone out and created a parallel structure! And as you have pointed out, follow the money and you begin to understand that TPTB control both sides. One way or another we will be corralled into the future they have envisioned which is digital ID, digital currency, blockchain and digital twins for all, to be managed by the algorithms to perfect our existence….the bottom line or fly in the ointment? Who decides what is the perfect or desirable existence? Who decides what will make the individual happy, or the community healthy?

They would have you believe that stakeholder capitalism and technology is the perfect antidote to what ails us. But notice, they are not lobbying Congress or other legislative bodies to overhaul how fiduciary structure and duties in the corporate structure is defined, adjudicated, determined, etc.

Why? Because that could make them vulnerable to the low life’s, you and I—the average citizens that they have only contempt for. Based on their life stories…they are the wildly successful ones who are enlightened and knowledgeable about how to save the world. And yet, it is their very industries, endeavors, lifestyles, and consumption that lies at the heart of what ails us….that snd the fact our culture has put them on pedestals.

Excellent research, Michael. And while I thoroughly value you providing the receipts….am curious, over the past 3-4 years…have you begun to feel the truth of the matter in your bones? I have even grown weary of the many cul de sacs on substack that do nothing more than waste time and rob me of enjoying or living my life until the door on the digital prison slams shut.

Maybe the best resistance is to get busy living and leave the Peterson’s, Malone’s, Nass’, and others to their narratives.

Expand full comment